Skip to main content
Treaties
Treaties in
Biological diversity
GLOBAL TREATIES
in
Biological diversity
Convention on Biological Diversity
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
Convention on Migratory Species
Cartagena Protocol
Nagoya Protocol
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
World Heritage Convention
Ramsar Convention
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
REGIONAL TREATIES
in
Biological diversity
Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds
Barcelona Convention
Prevention and Emergency Protocol
Land-Based Sources Protocol
Specially Protected Areas and Biodiversity Protocol
Protocol on Water and Health
Water Convention
Abidjan Convention
Noumea Convention
Cartagena Convention
Jeddah Convention
Nairobi Convention
Apia Convention
Antigua Convention
Kuwait Regional Convention
Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents
Lusaka Agreement
Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic and North Seas
Agreement on the Conservation of Populations of European Bats
Treaties in
Chemicals and Waste
GLOBAL TREATIES
in
Chemicals and Waste
Basel Convention
Stockholm Convention
Rotterdam Convention
Kyiv Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
Minamata Convention on Mercury
REGIONAL TREATIES
in
Chemicals and Waste
Barcelona Convention
Dumping Protocol
Prevention and Emergency Protocol
Land-Based Sources Protocol
Specially Protected Areas and Biodiversity Protocol
Hazardous Wastes Protocol
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution
Protocol on Water and Health
Abidjan Convention
Noumea Convention
Cartagena Convention
Jeddah Convention
Nairobi Convention
Apia Convention
Kuwait Regional Convention
Bamako Convention
Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents
Treaties in
Climate and Atmosphere
GLOBAL TREATIES
in
Climate and Atmosphere
Vienna Convention
Montreal Protocol
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Kyoto Protocol
Paris Agreement
REGIONAL TREATIES
in
Climate and Atmosphere
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution
Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents
Treaties in
Environmental Governance
GLOBAL TREATIES
in
Environmental Governance
Aarhus Convention
Kyiv Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
REGIONAL TREATIES
in
Environmental Governance
Espoo Convention
Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment
Lusaka Agreement
Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean
Treaties in
Land and Agriculture
GLOBAL TREATIES
in
Land and Agriculture
Cartagena Protocol
Nagoya Protocol
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
World Heritage Convention
Ramsar Convention
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
REGIONAL TREATIES
in
Land and Agriculture
Land-Based Sources Protocol
Specially Protected Areas and Biodiversity Protocol
Apia Convention
Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents
Treaties in
Marine and Freshwater
GLOBAL TREATIES
in
Marine and Freshwater
World Heritage Convention
Ramsar Convention
REGIONAL TREATIES
in
Marine and Freshwater
Barcelona Convention
Dumping Protocol
Prevention and Emergency Protocol
Land-Based Sources Protocol
Specially Protected Areas and Biodiversity Protocol
Protocol on Water and Health
Water Convention
Abidjan Convention
Noumea Convention
Cartagena Convention
Jeddah Convention
Nairobi Convention
Apia Convention
Antigua Convention
Kuwait Regional Convention
Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents
Treaties in
Africa
TREATIES
in Africa
Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds
Barcelona Convention
Dumping Protocol
Prevention and Emergency Protocol
Land-Based Sources Protocol
Specially Protected Areas and Biodiversity Protocol
Hazardous Wastes Protocol
Abidjan Convention
Nairobi Convention
Bamako Convention
Lusaka Agreement
Treaties in
Asia and the Pacific
TREATIES
in Asia and the Pacific
Noumea Convention
Jeddah Convention
Apia Convention
Antigua Convention
Kuwait Regional Convention
Treaties in
Europe
TREATIES
in Europe
Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds
Barcelona Convention
Dumping Protocol
Prevention and Emergency Protocol
Land-Based Sources Protocol
Specially Protected Areas and Biodiversity Protocol
Hazardous Wastes Protocol
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution
Espoo Convention
Protocol on Water and Health
Water Convention
Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment
Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents
Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic and North Seas
Agreement on the Conservation of Populations of European Bats
Treaties in
Latin America and the Caribbean
TREATIES
in Latin America and the Caribbean
Cartagena Convention
Regional Agreement on Access to Information, Public Participation and Justice in Environmental Matters in Latin America and the Caribbean
Global
treaties
Global
TREATIES
Convention on Biological Diversity
Basel Convention
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
Convention on Migratory Species
Stockholm Convention
Vienna Convention
Montreal Protocol
Cartagena Protocol
Nagoya Protocol
International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
World Heritage Convention
Kyoto Protocol
Ramsar Convention
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
Rotterdam Convention
Aarhus Convention
Kyiv Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
Minamata Convention on Mercury
Paris Agreement
See all treaties
Parties
Law & Cases
Events
Glossary
Goals
More+
Documents and Literature
Contacts Hub
About InforMEA
Contact
Get Involved
Free online courses
Browse all
BROWSE ALL by
Environmental Topic
Biological diversity
Chemicals and Waste
Climate and Atmosphere
Environmental Governance
Land and Agriculture
Marine and Freshwater
BROWSE ALL by
Regions
Africa
Asia and the Pacific
Europe
Latin America and the Caribbean
North America
Polar: Arctic
West Asia
Global
EN
Access information on Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Treaties
Treaty texts
Decision texts
National Submissions
National Plans
National Reports
Law and Cases
Legislation
Court Decisions
Documents and Literature
Documents
Literature
News and events
News
Events
Goals and Declarations
Goals
Declarations
Contacts HUB
All categories
Explore only content tagged with
Sections
General info
Related strategic items
Related content
Home
Activity A.6.2.3 Re-examine the Suzhou Decision.
Activity A. 1.3.1 Develop a global conservation strategy that includes but is not limited to points below (these activities could be transferred to the conservation strategy once established)
Activity A.1.1.1 Reconfirm the primacy of Outstanding Universal Value within the Convention and its purpose to protect and conserve places of Outstanding Universal Value that require the assistance of the international community.
Activity A.1.1.3 Statements of Outstanding Universal Value are included on web.
Activity A.1.2.1 Define monitoring Key Performance Indicator (KPI)s (related to the Outstanding Universal Value) for all properties that are the subject of state of conservation reports, including review of other standard setting exercises and lessons drawn from Periodic reporting.
Activity A.1.2.2 Create tools to recognise excellence (i.e. shift focus of Committee from sole focus on problems in SOC context) as reported by external bodies.
Activity A.1.2.3 Develop and disseminate widely a system to prioritise and systematically select properties for state of conservation reports (e.g. for properties on or proposed for in danger listing, then those who had missions, then routine reports).
Activity A.1.2.4 Strengthen monitoring of properties; hold a workshop to discuss establishment of a system of proactive monitoring without waiting for the occurrence of serious problems.
Activity A.1.2.5 National governments encouraged to have regular dialogue with ICOMOS and IUCN about state of conservation of properties
Activity A.1.2.6 National governments encouraged involving ICOMOS and IUCN, including their regional structures, in process of preparing response to periodic reporting. Involvement includes Periodic Reporting training and information provision.
Activity A.1.2.7 Formally notify States Parties of the state of conservation reports on World Heritage properties in their territory which will be the subject of examination by the Committee at the session indicated; to enable dialogue, consider options for providing concerned State Party comment on state of conservation reports and/or State party right of reply (similar to nomination process).
Activity A.1.2.8 Decisions to default to a minimum two-year cycle for the examination of state of conservation reports for individual properties on the World Heritage List, and for the discussion of those inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger, except for cases of utmost urgency; World Heritage Fund to assist developing countries with state of conservation reporting and monitoring.
Activity A.1.3.2. Develop a database of existing guidance on key factors negatively impacting on the Outstanding Universal Value of World Heritage properties and tools for best management practice.
Activity A.1.3.3 Develop guidance to fill gaps in existing guidance, including: a) the need for EIAs/HIAs of potential developments’ impact on Outstanding Universal Value, the range of proposed activities with a likely impact on Outstanding Universal Value to be reported on and the documentation required by the World Heritage Centre, b) the uses, limits and documentation requirements for traditional management systems and c) protection mechanisms for setting (beyond and including buffer zones)
Activity A.1.3.4 Confirm the degree to which management systems and legal frameworks need to be in place before inscription (paragraph 115 of the Operational Guidelines).
Activity A.1.3.5 Provide an inventory on the website, based on retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value and linked to indicators, of World Heritage properties which have all attributes /elements of Outstanding Universal Value in place, and which do not.
Activity A.1.3.6 Develop and disseminate widely global standards for site management and tools for management effectiveness assessments, including risk and catastrophe planning for vulnerable sites.
Activity A.1.3.7 Prepare a thematic report on significant global and regional factors negatively impacting the Outstanding Universal Value of the properties, grouped according to the five categories of factors identified in the Periodic Report and any additional threats identified in the reporting process.
Activity A.1.3.8 Develop a four-year cycle for revisions to the Operational Guidelines.
Activity A.1.4.1 Use the Global Strategy for Capacity Building as a base to develop capacity building sub-strategies by region and sub-region, incorporating needs identified through periodic reporting.
Activity A.1.4.3 Consider establishment of a Site Management Network to facilitate exchange and sharing of information on best practice heritage management.
Activity A.1.5.1 The In-Danger listing mechanism is used in conformity with the provision of the Operational Guidelines (both for inscription and removal).
Activity A.1.5.2 Draft decisions for inscription of properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger include a costed program of operations needed, based on the agreed Corrective Measures needed to achieve the Desired State of Conservation for the removal of the property from the Danger List (article 11.4 of the Convention) and encourage the use of international assistance in meeting these needs.
Activity A.1.5.3 Clarify criteria/thresholds for in danger listing and for delisting properties in relation to Outstanding Universal Value.
Activity A.1.5.4 Analyse inscribed properties to identify key risks and publish a list of existing guidance on, risk assessment and threat management.
Activity A.2.1.1 Define and disseminate widely the objectives for the Global Strategy consistent with the objectives of the World Heritage Convention and based on evaluation of successes and continuing challenges of 1994 Global Strategy - Establish criteria and monitoring Key Performance Indicator (KPI)s for the Global Strategy to assess nature and causes of major gaps -Establish effective analytical frameworks and statistics to allow understanding of how sub-regions might contribute to the Global Strategy.
Activity A.2.1.2 Establish priorities for thematic studies and initiatives linked to the Global Strategy and identify additional resources for their completion, publication and dissemination.
Activity A.2.1.3 Encourage States Parties whose heritage is already well represented on the World Heritage List to consider supporting a nomination with one presented by a State Party whose heritage is unrepresented or under-represented, as foreseen in paragraph 59c of the Operational Guidelines.
Activity A.2.1.4 Develop options for means to preserve sites that are outside of the sovereignty of States Parties responding to the conditions of Outstanding Universal Value.
Activity A.2.2.1 Complete and assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the ‘upstream processes’ pilot projects, with a view to continuing and expanding the program of work; consider the development of guidance to assist and encourage States Parties to formulate, and prioritise tentative lists through community engagement, and harmonise lists in sub-regions.
Activity A.2.2.2 Disseminate widely the benefits of States Parties undergoing the 30 September preliminary advice stage (before year 1) and the requirements to pass the technical/completeness check stage before nominations proceed to Advisory Bodies for assessment.
Activity A.2.2.3 Upgrade registration process (between 1 Feb and 1 March year 1) to include both technical check for completeness and to indicate whether prima facie all elements of justification of Outstanding Universal Value are met, including those where judgement is required E.g. check list to indicate whether nomination compares each claim to Outstanding Universal Value against all sites on World Heritage List, Tentative Lists and other obvious sites; that all elements of protection and management are articulated. Nominations that do not meet all elements not permitted to proceed further.
Activity A.2.2.4 Develop a web database of sites on World Heritage and Tentative List searchable by theme, place, size, time on in danger lists and other characteristics to assist States Parties in development of Tentative Lists and nominations
Activity A.2.2.5 Develop and disseminate widely guidance on comparative analysis, conservation and management, integrity and authenticity, including through publication of best practice examples.
Activity A.2.2.6 Publicise alternative options for recognition and preservation of sites that may not meet the standards of Outstanding Universal Value at the regional level or by themes.
Activity A.3.1.1 Develop methodology for assessing and evaluating social and economic impact of inscription on World Heritage List and strategies for sustainable development investment for communities before and after inscription.
Activity A.3.1.2 Develop clear policy, including standards on conservation and sustainable development, drawing on Rio+20 outcomes.
Activity A.3.1.3 Develop tools to guide States Parties in integrating heritage protection into planning processes and on effective community engagement, especially in World Heritage sites where there is traditional land ownership and management.
Activity A.4.1.1 Consider further the implications of and possible timing for an International World Heritage Day for raising awareness on World Heritage.
Activity A.4.1.2 Subject to funds, organise exhibitions celebrating World Heritage successes e.g. a tribute to Egyptologist Christiane Desroche-Noblecourt and her role in saving the Nubian Temples in 1959.
Activity A.4.1.3 Publicise best practice examples of heritage protection, showcasing World Heritage properties as best practice for heritage protection.
Activity A.4.1.4 Develop systems to identify and assist the adoption of World Heritage insights and experiences.
Activity A.4.2.1 Develop a clear brand strategy for World Heritage, including the use of the World Heritage Emblem, based on an audit of public perceptions of World Heritage and linked to PACT.
Activity A.4.2.2 Media briefing by Chair on World Heritage objectives and achievements prior to statutory sessions and capacity building sessions held for journalists on World Heritage.
Activity A.4.2.3 Develop, support and carry out activities to promote the 40th anniversary.
Activity A.5.1.1 Collect all policy recommendations from Committee or General Assembly together on web in searchable format and identify gaps.
Activity A.5.1.2 Develop ‘Policy Guidelines’ (similar format to the Operational Guidelines) by drawing on policy database and separating out the policy elements of Operational Guidelines into new structure.
Activity A.5.1.3 Streamline thematic programs in accordance with needs identified in Periodic Reporting.
Activity A.5.1.4 Consider options for the greater use of Consultative Groups during Committee sessions or the recognition of requests for interventions from non-members of the Committee on policy agenda items, at the discretion of the Chair.
Activity A.5.1.5 Consider options for Advisory Body and Observer interventions in policy debates at the Committee and General Assembly.
Activity A.5.1.6 Subject to funds, hold three regular (not extended) sessions of the Committee each biennium, including each odd year at UNESCO Headquarters immediately after the General Assembly.
Activity A.5.1.7 Clarify rules of membership, terms of reference and the status of reports of expert working groups.
Activity A.5.2.1 States Parties submit examples of heritage based development for publication on the web to illustrate linkages between heritage and the larger context of national capacity building.
Activity A.5.2.2 Establish and promote cooperation and understanding between cultural and natural heritage institutions, including those responsible for UNESCO programme implementation, economy, finance, regional development/planning, tourism and social welfare.
Activity A.6.1.1 Develop and disseminate clear and consistent criteria for decisions on inscriptions/ referrals/ deferrals and right of reply.
Activity A.6.1.2 Develop further the induction programme for Committee members.
Activity A.6.1.3 Develop a searchable database of decisions and test it for ease of use.
Activity A.6.1.4 Develop a manual explaining key procedures e.g. nominations, state of conservation, voting, provision of documents.
Activity A.6.1.5 Develop and use standard, concise text in draft decisions, focused on priority Convention issues and implementation.
Activity A.6.1.6 Develop a procedure enabling consultation of secretariat and Advisory Bodies on technical or Operational Guidelines implications of amendments to draft decisions.
Activity A.6.1.7 Develop and distribute to members an inventory of actions arising from Committee meetings and the costs associated with implementation.
Activity A.6.1.8 Link state of conservation reports to an integrated online database compiling all relevant background information concerning the property necessary for well-informed decision-making
Activity A.6.2.1 Consider options to enhance the role of the Bureau (without assuming a decision-making role or increasing meeting time).
Activity A.6.2.2 Review working methods of other conventions and explore options to manage workloads, including prioritisation, secret ballots and sub-committees.
Activity A.6.2.3 Re-examine the Suzhou Decision.
Activity A.6.2.4 Report on actions arising from the Committee includes allocation of responsibility between World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies in accordance with roles outlined in the Operational Guidelines.
Activity A.6.2.5 Develop and distribute widely a consolidated annual list of proposed meetings to assess priorities and available human and financial resources.
Activity A.6.3.1 Review implementation status of Audit Report on operations of World Heritage Centre
Activity A.6.3.2 Develop and publish an annual calendar of activities and deadlines for the implementation of the Convention, resolving any anomalies.
Activity A.6.4.1 Develop cost modules for key activities and cost decisions and assess workload implications of decisions prior to adoption.
Activity A.6.4.2 Consider means to improve the allocation of International Assistance to identified needs.
Activity A.6.4.3 Establish a standing consultative body for review of the Committee’s biennial budget.
Activity A.6.4.4 Review budgetary allocations and analyse resource and expenditure patterns.
Activity A.6.4.5 Link Committee and UNESCO budget cycles to ensure all statutory functions are fully funded by the regular budget.
Activity A.6.4.6 Explore ways to increase contributions to the WHF and develop a fundraising strategy which considers means to link extra-budgetary contributions to Committee priorities.
Activity A.6.4.7 Establish an annual report on the extra-budgetary funds benefiting World Heritage properties.
Activity A.6.5.1 Outcomes under Strategic Action plan are reported to General Assembly State Parties.
Activity A.6.5.2 World Heritage Centre annual report to Committee reflects priorities of the Strategic Action Plan and reports against outcomes/results rather than activities.
Activity A.6.5.3 Present a study on options for oversight and monitoring mechanisms for the statutory organs of the World Heritage Convention.
Activity A1.1.2 Complete retrospective statements of Outstanding Universal Value for all World Heritage properties.
Activity A1.4.2 Explore opportunities presented by Category 2 regional centres and new regional funds for capacity building on conservation methods and outcomes.
Goal 1 of world heritage: the outstanding universal value of world heritage sites is maintained
KPI 2.1.1 Objectives, criteria and monitoring Key Performance Indicator (KPI)s developed through States Parties submissions for consideration by Committee; World Heritage Centre reporting on implementation of the Global Strategy through criteria and monitoring Key Performance Indicator (KPI)s; reporting on effectiveness sub-region in meeting the Global Strategy through the analytical frameworks and statistics.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.1.1 World Heritage nominations focus on the most outstanding properties and for others not meeting the threshold, develop new tools for recognition and preservation.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.1.2 100% of properties on the World Heritage List have approved statements of Outstanding Universal Value.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.1.3 From 37 COM onwards Statements of Outstanding Universal Value are the basis for decision making on the state of conservation of World Heritage properties.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.2.1 Agreed monitoring indicators used by States Parties and Advisory Bodies that give accurate snapshot of state of conservation of a property in relation to the attributes of its Outstanding Universal Value.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.2.2 Increased media reporting of state of conservation successes (e.g., recent monitoring mission, local or regional Advisory Bodies committees); Used as showcase models for capacity building and training by the centre and Advisory Bodies.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.2.3 Prioritisation system for examination of state of conservation reports established and on website; critical sites reported on via website and Committee meetings.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.2.4 Relevant tools developed for States Parties to establish a system of proactive monitoring at national level; States Parties have a system of proactive monitoring incorporated into Plan of Management for each inscribed property. Advisory Bodies also encouraged to develop local monitoring networks.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.2.5 Fewer irreversible impacts recorded by the World Heritage Committee; ICOMOS, IUCN and Centre record fewer unexpected issues arising; state of conservation monitoring mechanisms used by Advisory Bodies defined and understood by States Parties.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.2.6 Periodic Report training undertaken including local or regional structures of ICOMOS and IUCN; IUCN and ICOMOS demonstrating; active engagement between States Parties and Advisory Bodies.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.2.7 States Parties notified of upcoming state of conservation report by Centre 2 months before Committee meeting and States Parties fully prepared to respond; reduction in provision of last minute information by States Parties (trend line down).
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.2.8 Increased compliance with remedial actions and reduced reports of little progress (trend line down); trend graphs show fewer properties on annual SOC reporting cycle; two year cycle implemented; increased on-going dialogue between States Parties and the Centre between Committee sessions.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.3.4 Para 115 of Operational Guidelines revised and provides greater clarity to States Parties.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.4.1 The Global Strategy of Capacity Building is funded and implemented and fewer capacity needs identified in future Periodic Reporting.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.4.3 As above.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 1.5.1 Working group established at the 36 COM; Rules of Procedure revised to forbid a State Party serving on the Committee to take part in the decision following debates on state of conservation reports concerning a property located in its territory.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 2.1.2 Thematic studies identified, produced and fully funded on priority topics.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 2.1.3 Increased number of linked nominations between well and less represented States Parties.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 2.1.4 Submissions received and paper prepared for discussion by Committee on options for protecting sites outside the sovereignty of States Parties.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 2.2.1 Assessment of upstream pilot projects completed and used to inform possible extension of the program; Guidance on tentative lists published on web; States Parties and others encouraged to submit case studies, with best recognised by Committee; Submissions received on tentative list prioritisation and options published on web.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 2.2.2 Reduction in nominations that do not meet all requirements of Operational Guidelines, proceeding to evaluation by Committee. States Parties expect that the nomination process will take 2.5 years, not 1.5.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 2.2.3 All inscribed properties demonstrate Outstanding Universal Value in line with criteria for inscription and comply with integrity/authenticity, protection and management requirements, as set out in the Operational Guidelines.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 2.2.4 Searchable database of World Heritage and Tentative List sites available on web.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 2.2.5 Guidance on preparation of nomination developed and published on web; States Parties use nomination advice.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 2.2.6 State Parties aware of options for recognition beyond World Heritage.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 3.1.1 State Parties undertaking studies on World Heritage impact and publish on web. Cost, benefit analysis undertaken to provide greater understanding of the pre-conditions for potential economic and social value of inscription and conservation for communities.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 3.1.2 Individual States Parties have policies on conservation and sustainable development which are shared through World Heritage website; standards defined, evaluated and adopted.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 3.1.3 Submissions sought on tools in use by State Parties on heritage and planning and community engagement. Consultant engaged to develop tools in specific priority areas, particularly those vulnerable to threats from unregulated development.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 4.1.1 Submissions received on options for International World Heritage Day.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 4.1.2 World Heritage successes identified and funds found to hold exhibitions.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 4.1.3 Submissions sought from State Parties and others, with annual recognition of best practice heritage protection examples by Committee; information received remains on web.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 4.1.4 As above.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 4.2.1 Encourage individual State Parties to undertake audit of public perceptions of World Heritage to enable brand focussed approach at national level; develop Brand Strategy to enable capture of value from global value of brand.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 4.2.2 Increased and accurate media reporting on World Heritage – via a media portal. Media monitoring undertaken, and responses made when appropriate.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 4.2.3 States Parties report on activities to World Heritage Centre and published on web.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 5.1.1 Initial collection of policy guidance searchable on web.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 5.1.2 Policy guidelines developed and policy elements removed from Operational Guidelines.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 5.2.1 Recognition of best practice heritage based development at each session of the Committee.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 5.2.2 Secretariat report under item 5B continues to report cooperation between national heritage and other institutions.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 6.2.1 Committee work facilitated by Bureau.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 6.2.2 Submissions on working methods of other conventions.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 6.3.2 Annual calendar published.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 6.5.1 Actions associated with priority policy issues are implemented.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 6.5.2 World Heritage Centre annual report focuses on results.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI 6.5.3 Actions associated with priority policy issues are implemented.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI. 1.3.1 Global conservation strategy developed and fully funded for implementation
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.1.3.2 Database updated annually including provision for States Parties and Advisory Bodies to contribute new advice as it arises. Awards provided to States Parties for best practice management at each Committee meeting.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.1.3.3 Submissions/ Consultancy undertaken to identify gaps and develop guidance on conservation requirements and practices; States Parties widely consulted on tools currently in use addressing gaps. Guidance provided on the website.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.1.3.5 Details of missing attributes/element of Outstanding Universal Value are voluntarily submitted by States Parties for consideration of remedial actions.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.1.3.6 Workshop/ consultancy undertaken to develop global management standards and tools; standards agreed by States Parties, subsequent voluntary submissions by States Parties and others, with best practice management recognised.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.1.3.7 Thematic report produced on key threats on an agreed regular basis.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.1.3.8 Clarity provided regarding process and timelines for revisions to the Operational Guidelines.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.1.5.2 Draft decisions on Danger Listing incorporate costed programme of remedial actions for removal from the Danger List; States Parties have clear set of expectations about remedial actions required; programme of remedial actions remains constant; follow up reporting on meeting funding goals; States Parties meet funding gaps.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.1.5.3 Decisions to inscribe on the Danger List or remove from World Heritage List are consistent across all States Parties World Heritage sites and clearly documented in relation to threats to Outstanding Universal Value or loss of Outstanding Universal Value.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.1.5.4 States Parties are assisted to develop (and use) a list of key risks associated with their properties and guidance to manage serious threats; all existing guidance material distributed through website and other communication channels.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.5.1.4 Committee considers options for greater consultation on policy issues.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.5.1.6 Funds are found to hold three regular sessions of the Committee each biennium.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.5.1.7 Rules and status of expert working groups clarified.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.1. 2 Committee members are better informed of processes and procedures.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.1.1 Trend up on consistency of decisions.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.1.3 Database search tool developed and a trend up on use of database. Targeted user testing undertaking in all regions and subregions.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.1.4 Committee members are better informed of processes and procedures.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.1.5 Trend up on consistency of decisions.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.1.6 Decisions are consistent with Operational Guidelines.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.1.7 Implementation of decisions is monitored and budget implications considered.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.1.8 Decisions are consistent and well informed.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.2.4 Greater consistency with Operational Guidelines of roles and responsibilities between World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.2.5 Non-statutory meetings prioritised.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.3.1 Audit Report recommendations fully implemented.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.4.1 Key decisions are costed before adoption.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.4.2 International Assistance targets identified needs (trend up) through supporting conservation priorities identified through state of conservation reporting and Periodic Reporting cycles. States Parties assisted in application process if necessary.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.4.3 Standing Budget consultative committee established and operating.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.4.4 Reporting on finance considers the full picture of funding the work of the Convention from all sources.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.4.5 Statutory functions fully funded by regular budget.
Key Performance Indicator (KPI) KPI.6.4.6 Increased contribution of private sponsorship to target priorities.
WORLD HERITAGE GOAL 3: Heritage protection and conservation considers present and future environmental, societal and economic needs.
WORLD HERITAGE GOAL 4: World Heritage maintains or enhances its brand quality.
WORLD HERITAGE GOAL 5: The Committee can address policy and strategic issues
WORLD HERITAGE GOAL 6: Decisions of statutory meetings are informed and effectively implemented.
World Heritage Goal 2: The World Heritage List is a credible, selection of the world’s most outstanding cultural and natural heritage.
Explore content